On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 11:02:28AM +0100, Richard A Burton wrote: > For some reason the build failed because it couldn't find gcc. Maybe > build-essential was broken? It failed on several platforms but all the > others have tried again since, and built successfully.
Yes, build-essential was broken (libc6-dev depends on linux-libc-dev, linux-libc-dev conflicts with linux-kernel-headers, something else wanted to pull l-k-h back into the chroots and kicked out g++ and libstdc++-dev). I don't know why the mipsel failures weren't given back earlier, but I see that more recent builds have been finding g++ just fine, so I've requeued the lot of these. > Also, is there a problem with sparc builds? The last version of kicad > never actually got built, and it's getting further down the queue. It > was 40 odd, then one hundred and something, now over 200. Yes, bug #433187. (It's only at 84 in the queue, now; the jump to 200 was caused by the scheduling of binNMUs for a glib1.2 library change, but those have all been deferred because gtk+1.2 isn't binNMU-safe.) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
