Your message dated Sat, 3 Oct 2026 21:26:25 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1116376: MBF: Packages which FTBFS when built with the
nocheck profile
has caused the Debian Bug report #1116376,
regarding MBF: Packages which FTBFS when built with the nocheck profile
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1116376: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1116376
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Dear Release Managers:
AFAIK, this was going to be RC for trixie, but in the last minute you
requested to file remaining bugs as important, because there were more
affected packages than expected and the release was close.
For forky, I will try to report this category of bugs in a more
consistent way (i.e. more often and not letting those issues to
accumulate without reporting them). Currently I have around 220 bugs
pending to be reported, and I would like to report them like this:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity: important
[...]
Note 1: This category of bugs is considered RC. To give maintainers
some more time to fix them, they are initially reported as "important",
but the severity will be raised to "serious" after some weeks.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If this is ok for you, I will proceed.
Alternatively, if you think it would be better, I could also report
them directly as serious, considering that testing currently has more
than 1300 RC bugs due to GCC 15, CMake 4, and others.
Thanks.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, 30 Sep 2025 00:47:28 +0200 Santiago Vila <[email protected]> wrote:
After that, I believe this bug may be closed.
So, let's do that.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
