On 30/08/07 at 12:40 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Pierre Habouzit wrote: > >> Hmm you mean I should inform a Maintainer's package for a package > >> whose last 4 uploads since 2006-10-27 are NMUs ? for a bug that is > >> what, 10 months old ? Heh. It qualifies to the 0-day NMU policy for so > >> many reasons that well... > > > > I totally agree with you here! > > Could we at least write those down or at least agree on what qualifies > > to the 0-day NMU policy? As far as I know, it's just the "we are about > > to release" reason I am familiar with. > > Acked too. If it's open for too long time and there's no activity, > it's OK to NMU it. > > The only exception is if the maintainer is active and easy to contact > so is nice to coodinate with him/her.
Before the release, we had a 0-day NMU policy for bugs older than 7 days. Maybe we could have a permanent 0-day NMU policy for bugs older than 21 days, or older than a month? Also, it would be great if this could be extended to the release goals. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
