On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 11:06:17AM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote: > libcdio changed SONAME/package name without warning; maintainer thinks > the release team shouldn't be bothered for such a small transition; > could you please clarify whether it's ok to bother the release team for > transitions like this one?
Sending them through the release team is nice, because then we have control over when and how the transition collides with other transitions. :) > If that's ok with you, please schedule bin NMUs for: > mednafen/0.8.1-1 > gst-plugins-good0.10/0.10.6-3 > xmms2/0.2DrJekyll-4 > vlc/0.8.6.c-3 > libdevice-cdio-perl/0.2.4-2 > fuse-umfuse-iso9660/0.2-2 For example, xmms2 is still tied up in the boost transition, so it would probably be best to push the boost transition through (even though this breaks libxmmsclient++1 on arm) and then schedule the binNMUs for cdio. > NB: I excluded vcdimager as it seems to have been reuploaded already > (maintainer is the same as libcdio). libdevice-cdio-perl has also been reuploaded, so will be excluded from the binNMUs. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
