Pierre Habouzit a écrit : > On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 05:21:36PM +0000, Steve Langasek wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 05:55:29PM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote: >> >>> rebuilding Boost as-is would require a new Boost transition. >> Why would that be? gcc-4.1 and gcc-4.2 are supposed to be fully >> ABI-compatible. > > Because boost upstream encodes all the things they use to build it in > their soname or whatever, making it ABI incompatible ? And I'm sure > they're proud of it to boo(s)t. >
It looks like boost is making a contest with apt. But apt wins, because it also encodes the glibc version in the soname. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
