Hi, On Sun Dec 30, 2007 at 11:44:35 -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote: > I was recently reminded that the version of aptitude in etch still > has bug #415468, now re-opened as bug #438725. To summarize, it means > that aptitude's manpage looks like this: > > To select a particular version of the package, append > “\fB=<version>\fR” to the package name: for instance, > “\fBaptitude install apt=0.3.1\fR”. Similarly, to select a > package from a particular archive, append “\fB/<archive>\fR” > to the package name: for instance, “\fBaptitude install
yes, that looks ugly. > This has been fixed for a long time in unstable, but the fix didn't > make it into etch. Luckily, the version of DocBook that shipped with > etch generates correct output for the version of the aptitude > documentation that shipped with etch. So all that's needed is a simple > rebuild and aptitude's manpages will be readable again. > > Is it possible that an aptitude rebuild could be worked into the next > stable revision? Actually, i do not see the severity for this bug to be release-critical. It looks ugly, but hey, one can still read it. So i would say: no. Luk, Andi, if you are different opinion, please say so. Greetings Martin -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# man real-life No manual entry for real-life -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
