On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 12:06:50PM +0100, Fathi Boudra wrote: > > The subject is misleading; you seem to be asking for permission to start a > > transition, not for binNMUs?
> yes > > If all of these packages have the same versions in testing and unstable, > > then it should be fine to start the transition. If some do not, then those > > would need closer examination to be sure they aren't tied to existing > > transitions. > from christopher martin about gwenview: > "you could go ahead with the exiv2 transition and then binNMU > gwenview, but I guess to complete the transition quickly you'd need to > yank gwenview from testing, where it would remain absent until gcc-4.3 > moves down (corrent me if I'm wrong here)." There's no reason for that at all. gcc-4.3 is no longer a blocker for gwenview in testing (the requisite version of gcc-4.3 has already passed to testing), and even if it were, gwenview would almost certainly not be the only package affected by the libgcc shlibs bump. > exiv2-0.16-1 uploaded today. it's in the NEW queue. Ok, sounds good. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
