On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 10:36:22AM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri Feb 01, 2008 at 10:10:47 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > Philippe Cloutier writes: > > > Le January 31, 2008 08:39:52 pm Tom Marble, vous avez ?crit?: > > > [...] > > > > Please consider the uploading of 1.5.0_14 as previously mentioned > > > > as a "timely reaction from the Java maintenance team". > > > > Please make this fix available to etch users, not just sid users > > > > (a timely reaction from the Debian Release Team :-) ). > > > > > > > As I was trying to say, it's the (Debian) Sun Java maintainance team's > > > responsability to upload a fixed package for stable. > > > > > > If the maintainance team doesn't react timely and nobody else proposes a > > > fixed > > > package to the security team, then it will be the release team's > > > responsability to remove the RC-buggy package from stable. As the bug was > > > just reported, it's still too early for intervention from the release > > > team. > > > > The security already did give the statement that they don't care about > > security updates for non-free. So it doesn't seem too much to *ask* > > the release team if they consider such an update at all. > > i would consider it stable, but i am just about to close r3 after the > next dinstall, so we could only consider it only if there would be all > archs (ia64, amd64 and i386) availible within 24h from now) or for r4.
I can build ia64 today if a source package gets posted within a few hours. -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
