Hi, On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 05:41:29PM +0100, Guido Guenther wrote: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 03:12:33PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 02:30:30PM +0100, Guido Guenther <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > according to http://people.debian.org/~igloo/status.php?packages=libvirt > > > libvirt has not been tried on anything except i386 and amd64. The same > > > says http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=libvirt. Why is libvirt > > > being ignored by the other architectues? I seems there hasn't been a > > > single build attempt. > > > > This [1] might give you a hint > Thanks! At the bottom it says: > > Packages-arch-specific: > > %libvirt: amd64 i386 # b-d > libxen3.1-dev > > which isn't true (we don't even build xen support at the moment) and I > wonder why the other architectures say: "not registered". And this one says basically the same: http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?p=libvirt libvirt isn't an arch specific package, so the buildds should build it. How can I get libvirt out of PAS? -- Guido
P.S.: please cc: me since I'm not subscribed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
