On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 09:27:12AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> I'm confused by this output from grep-excuses:
> 
> telegnome (- to 0.1.0-3)
>     Maintainer: Colin Watson
>     Too young, only 1 of 10 days old
>     out of date on alpha: telegnome (from 0.0.10-7)
>     out of date on hppa: telegnome (from 0.0.10-7)
>     telegnome (source, i386, alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, ia64, mips, mipsel, 
> powerpc, s390, sparc, armel) has new bugs!
>     Updating telegnome introduces new bugs: #464331
>     Not considered
> 
> #464331 is:
> 
>   Severity: serious;
>   Found in version telegnome/0.0.10-7;
>   Fixed in version telegnome/0.1.0-1 by Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
>   Version Graph;
>   Done: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> 
> Has something gone wrong with britney's bug counts? Or is it a problem
> on the bugs.d.o side? If the latter, I'm happy to look into that myself,
> but without being able to see britney's input files I can't quite tell.

In BugsV there is "telegnome 464331".  This is because the package is
not in sync on all architectures and thus contains buggy versions in
unstable (0.0.10-7).

Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
-- 
 .''`.  Philipp Kern                             Debian Developer
: :' :  http://philkern.de                       Debian Release Assistant
`. `'   xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  `-    finger pkern/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to