Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Steve Langasek [Sat, 10 May 2008 23:03:25 -0700]: > >> That wouldn't be a good idea unless we first get support for keeping >> old library packages around in testing to allow asynchronous transitions. >> Otherwise, testing transitions would become far more brittle than they >> currently are. > > Oh, point. But I don't think there were plans to make the current > britney support build-depends, and britney2 *already* supports keeping > old library packages around.
I don't understand why dependency checking plus build dependency checking would need support for keeping old library packages while dependency checking without build dependency checking doesn't need it? Isn't it just a matter of migrating needed build dependencies together with migrating packages like it's also migrating needed dependencies together now? Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
