On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 05:56:08PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Frans Pop [Sun, 18 May 2008 17:38:52 +0200]:
> > Given that, maybe even removal would be an option, but I'll leave that to > > RMs. > The removal will happen eventually, since it's been removed from > unstable already. But not before libaws is rebuilt against libldap-2.4-2, > which FTBFSed, and needs somebody investigating it. Getting libaws rebuilt against libldap-2.4-2 isn't a precondition. I intend for libldap2 to be removed for lenny, regardless. But libldap-2.4-2 shouldn't conflict with libldap2 anyway. That was an unauthorized NMU change which I intend to revert. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
