On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 05:08:17PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 01:19:12PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 05:40:13PM +0100, Frederic Peters wrote: > > > I am the maintainer of pdftohtml, it embeds code from xpdf, and can be > > > replaced by pdftohtml from poppler-utils; this has been the case in sid > > > for months (package got removed from sid/lenny in June) and nobody > > > complained about compatibility problems using the new poppler code. > > You uploaded pdftohtml to p-u and I accepted it very recently. Sadly it > > causes xpdf to be removed from systems, because it has a strictly > > versionned dependency on xpdf-utils. That package is provided by > > poppler-utils, but the version numbers do not match up. > > > > So it would be appreciated if you could upload an xpdf version with that > > dependency relaxed, or even converted to poppler-utils. > > I did prepare an upload. See the attached debdiff for details.
Why are you hacking xpdf to fix a relationship problem between pdftohtml and poppler-utils? Neither of them are xpdf-utils. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
