Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:19:23AM +0000, Bastian Venthur wrote: >> Pierre Habouzit wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 04:51:08PM +0000, Bastian Venthur wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> reportbug-ng now supports /usr/share/bug/*/script and sends the output >>>> if the file is available. The lack of this feature rendered rng unfit >>>> for release in the eyes of the release team, since it's implemented now >>>> I think rng should enter testing again. >>> Does it supports presubjs and helps the user choosing a proper severity >>> for bugs he reports ? >> It does not show presubjs. > > This is a major stopper. > >> What do you mean by helping to choose a proper severity? The default >> severity is "normal" and the "what is this" help of the box where you >> can select the severity explains every severity in detail. > > There is an RC bug about that (or at least the RM team consider it a > blocker) where there is really sensible explanations on why this is not > a good UI and that it leads to bad bug reports.
If I remember correctly Phillip blocked rng because it didn't sent the output of /usr/share/bug/*/script. That's at least what I understood when reading Phillip's mail and that is fixed now. I never heard that it was blocked because the UI isn't good enough. I don't want to have to guess what also has to be fixed until you decide rng is good enough for lenny or lenny+1, so please give me an exact list of the remaining open points which have to be fixed until rng is fit for testing. As a next step, I want that list and the fittnes of rng discussed on tech-ctte. Frankly, I doubt that you are still deciding from a neutral POV, especially regarding the discussion between you and me documented in #422085. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
