Riku Voipio wrote: > On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 01:27:57AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: >> * Hubert Chathi [Sat, 19 Jul 2008 11:35:20 -0400]: >> >>> How is that? noweb just depends on gawk, iconx, and libc6, and the >>> dependency on iconx is unversioned, so shouldn't it be satisfied with >>> the version of icon that's in testing? >> There is no noweb in armel in testing, though, so in order to migrate >> noweb/2.11b-7/armel, britney wants to migrate iconx/9.4.3-1/armel first. >> And see #475952 about that... > >> However, since noweb/armel is broken in testing anyway, migrating it >> does not makes things worse, so I've added a force hint to let noweb >> migrate. > > And to fix that last part, should I upload a icon/9.4.2-2.8/armel to > t-p-u or can you force icon/9.4.3-1/armel in?
That version is already unblocked as being in unstable at the moment of the freeze... Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
