On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 20:09 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > So, testing currently contains Clutter 0.6 and unstable contains Clutter > > 0.8, apart from pyclutter which is still stuck at 0.6 (upstream > > problems). We'd like to see Clutter 0.8 be part of Lenny so propose > > that pyclutter 0.6 be removed from unstable and testing. This should > > let clutter, clutter-cairo, clutter-gst, clutter-gtk, clutter-perl 0.8 > > migrate into testing and then Lenny. > > > Does this sound feasible? Nothing in the archive depends on Clutter as > > yet so this shouldn't have any knock-on consequences. > > Yes, if your opinion as the maintainer of pyclutter is that lenny is > better off with clutter 0.8 than pyclutter 0.6, then we can do that.
Certainly is. We don't have a pyclutter 0.8 ready upstream yet, but it
would be very sad for Lenny to ship with Clutter 0.6 (which isn't
maintained any more)
> Since uploads of the packages you mention above arrived in time, I'll
> take care of having them migrated when they're ready.
Many thanks!
Ross
--
Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://burtonini.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
