On Sunday 03 August 2008 06:43, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=493181 > > > > In the above bug report I have requested a config file comment change and > > suggested that an application be made to have it included in Lenny. > > > > I realise that comment changes won't be really desired by the release > > team, but I think it would be really good to have the comments matching > > the latest code. > > Does this point to a regression in pam_selinux's compatibility with configs > using it from etch? Should we patch pam_selinux to map the obsolete > 'multiple' option to something appropriate, to provide an upgrade path?
Currently the "multiple" option seems to be simply ignored. I don't think that this issue is important enough to have backward compatibility. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Blog http://www.coker.com.au/sponsorship.html Sponsoring Free Software development -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
