On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:13:33AM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote: >> >>> the atlas package was uploaded: >> >>> http://packages.qa.debian.org/a/atlas.html >> >>> which fixes this RC (ftbfs) bug: >> >>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=486974 >> >>> would it be please possible to include it in lenny? >> >>> There is a problem though that it has problems building on some >>> architectures like alpha: >> >>> http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=atlas >> >>> But it works on i386, amd64 and most others. Is this a showstopper? >> >> Yes: >> >> 4. Autobuilding >> [...] >> >> Packages must autobuild without failure on all architectures on >> which they are supported. Packages must be supported on as many >> architectures as is reasonably possible. Packages are assumed to >> be supported on all architectures for which they have previously >> built successfully. Prior builds for unsupported architectures >> must be removed from the archive (contact -release or ftpmaster >> if this is the case). >> >> http://release.debian.org/lenny/rc_policy.txt >> >> atlas has significant reverse-dependencies, removing it from alpha is not >> acceptable to me with my alpha hat on. > > As Thomas Weber said, it seems we will have to find someone willing to > maintain atlas 3.8.0 to work on alpha. > > Also imho the packages should only depend on atlas and blas instead,
correction: depend on lapack and blas. Ondrej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
