Thomas Weber wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 24.08.2008, 18:58 +0200 schrieb Luk Claes: >> Thomas Weber wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> octave-ga's upstream notified us that the current version in Lenny is in >>> a bad shape and whether we could update it to current SVN, see >>> >>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=495489 >>> >>> Now, before you tar and feather me: upstream uses Lenny himself and has >>> tested this version on Lenny. >>> >>> I attach a 'clarified' diffstat: clarified in that I removed changes to >>> comments (line length changes in license texts account for quite some >>> stuff), documentation files and unit tests run at build time. >>> >>> >>> $ diffstat clarified_diff >>> __ga_problem__.m | 49 +----------------------- >>> __ga_stop__.m | 19 +++++---- >>> crossoverscattered.m | 27 ++++++------- >>> ga.m | 58 +++++++++++++++++++--------- >>> gaoptimset.m | 103 >>> ++++++++++----------------------------------------- >>> 5 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 166 deletions(-) >>> >>> There are some new script files in the SVN version, that are not really >>> accounted in the diffstat, but as these are new functions, there's no >>> chance of a regression. >> 42 files changed, 1215 insertions(+), 853 deletions(-) >> >> Sorry, I won't unblock this. > > ACK. > > Can you please hint the current octave-ga out of Lenny then? We will > probably provide a package on backports.org after the release.
removal hint added. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
