Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Luk Claes wrote: >> Guillem Jover wrote: >>> Thanks, uploaded now, and built everywhere. I forgot to mention in my >>> initial mail, that in addition to the normal testing, I did an upgrade >>> from etch to lenny, with out of disk conditions, and everything seemed >>> fine (except for apt-get or aptitude issues while trying to get an >>> upgrade solution). But still, I guess it would be no harm to set a >>> longer age, say 15 or a bit more? >> unblocked, set age-days to 15 > > Thanks, unfortunately we had to upload 1.14.22 due to a small regression. > This version contains only 3 code changes: > - an important bugfix on dpkg-gensymbols: > http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=c1947e80027fece5e67b7b1fea95ea113f5b307e > - 2 bugfixes concerning the new source format, the second link is the > regression that we wanted to fix > http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=246986993791123226c4a7fd5ad56591a9ee9c4d > http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=787f5f4c034ee5570ba540d0db838f546f0c158c > > Please update your unblock hint and maybe reduce the aging to 5 days > because we really want the (trigger-related) fixes from 1.14.21 in lenny > before many more people start testing etch-lenny upgrades.
unblocked, set age-days to 6. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]