On Tuesday 26 August 2008 05:54, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 12:49:49PM +0000, Russell Coker wrote: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=445595 > > The patch is broken. Next time, please guess that if there is a guard like: > > #if defined(i386) && defined(USE_MMX) > > It's because the file is built on all architectures.
Are i386 and AMD64 the only architectures that support non-executable stacks? If not then which architectures have this support? How does the patch break things? I don't think that adding a few bytes to a shared object counts as breakage, in the case of security relevant bugs I think it's best to err on the side of caution. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
