Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Frans Pop wrote:
>> If I understand Jérémy's comments correctly, cdebconf will need to be
>> modified and will need a versioned build dep on the new cairo/directfb
>> packages when those have been uploaded.
>>
>> Reason: without those modifications cdebconf-gtk-udeb can no longer be
>> rebuilt correctly against the new cairo/directfb libs.
>>
>> Can we please get an RC1 release out and not keep pushing it back for
>> every upload of a random package on which D-I depends? The way things are
>> going now we'll very likely to need an RC2 for some reason anyway and
>> meanwhile we are getting absolutely NO proper D-I testing.
>
> I tend to disagree. cairo is uploaded, directfb and cdebconf are
> (co-)maintained by members of the d-i team and these are the last we are
> waiting on for d-i RC1 AFAICS?
>
> Why would we need an RC2 anyway? Unless there are very good reasons to
> do an RC2, we should be releasing about a month after RC1 IMHO.
Yes, I agree on that too. We should try to avoid an RC2 and then wait
a cuple of days more won't hurt.
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
