Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > tags 503616 + patch > thanks > > Dear -release-rs, > > how should I push the fix for #503616? Via t-p-u or unstable + unblock > request? > > Long story: only recently it has been brought to my attention #503616 > which affects an Apache module currently in testing. > > I do have a fix already, but it involves using an -rpath. Still, I do > believe it is possible one of the few proper usages of -rpath, my > reasoning is in the bug log, and is agreed upon by other Debian OCaml > members. > > Also, this solution permits to fix only ocamlnet in Lenny, while the > other (rpath-free) solution I envisaged would require fixing both > ocamlnet and ocaml in the Lenny timeframe. (... and we do not think it > is the right solution.) > > Now, my question is how should I push the fix: via t-p-u or via > unstable + unblock request? The diff to the latest ocamlnet version in > Lenny is attached for review.
t-p-u is a workaround so should only be used if unstable is no option. So if posssible, please use use unstable. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
