"Nelson A. de Oliveira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi,
>> You are replacing an unsigned type by a signed type (several >> occurrences). Is that intentional? > > This fix is from upstream. > I can confirm with him if you would like to. Better confirm with upstream than introduce new, subtle bugs at that point. Going from an unsigned to a signed type can be easily overlooked until it's too late. JB. -- Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
