Mike Hommey wrote: > On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 08:03:36PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: >> Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: >>> On 2009-01-28, Luk Claes <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: >>>>> Luk Claes wrote: >>>>>> Do you also take care of documenting this in the Release Notes? >>>>> I'll do that in the next days. >>>> Ok, thanks! >>> I've filed a bug against release-notes. Do the now obsolete binary >>> packages (like iceape-browser) need to be removed by FTP masters? >> It's already removed by FTP masters, iceape just needs to migrate to >> have any effect in testing (which won't happen before all reverse deps >> are fixed). > > What do you mean by that? Theorically, there is nothing to do to reverse > dependencies. Keeping iceape-dev and iceape-dev-bin ensures they can be > built from source, but they shouldn't need rebuilding or any NMU.
Ah, ok, the better. That just means that the issues listed in `grep-excuses iceape` need to be solved before it migrates. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
