Michael Tautschnig wrote: > There is just a slightly archive-specific problem: A package in main must not > depend on something outside main (at least so I guess, I couldn't find the > docs > stating this rightaway). We'd thus need some clamav package in main, and not > only in volatile. Which more or less is the situation we have today.
Mmmmk, then forget what i've said. It indeed doesn't make much sense anymore. > To me, the approach of moving clamav + all its rdepends to volatile really > looks > like the only option. Yeah, I agree. -acab -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
