Relax Adeodato... It may be seems difficult but it is possible, believe me ;-)
Maybe I has forgotten something... I really do not pretend to know everything about Debian develop. I would like to but I don't know everything and sometimes I may make some errors... lucky you that you don't. However I read the following sentence: "Not touching package, as requested by freeze (contact debian-release if update is needed)" in the excuses page of KLog[1]. So I just thought that contacting debian-release could be the solution, it seems that it is not. Thank you for your help. Yes, I though that maybe the debian-release team could move a package to testing. Dependencies of KLog in testing are not satisfied but just because of the hamlib's version in unstable. KLog work even with the stable hamlib. I supposed that people in this mailing list could help or at least send me some links to learn how I could work to put KLog in testing if it is possible (maybe forcing the dependencies to a lower version of hamlib) as I suppose people in this list knows about that kind of issue. I though it is not the first time you have to deal with something like this. If you don't want to loose your time, don't do it Adeodato but I am sure you can be more polite, even if you think I should leave the project or redo the NM. Relax... and, if I can suggest something I would like to tell you to enjoy developing and allow others to do it. Debian develop has to be fun or many people will leave the project. I am sure this is not your objective. Regarding my activity in the list, this is the SECOND mail I am sending... so the time you have lost because of my messages here is not much. I will not enter in a flamewar. I simply don't understand, what I think, your overreaction. Sorry for any inconveniences. Regards. Jaime [1] http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=klog > I would like to reply to your message in a calmly way, but it's proving > very difficult, because this is not the first nor the second time you do > something akin to this. Ignorance is not outrageous, not at all, but > repeated failure to take up on the suggestions that yours needs > addressing, > certainly is.¹ > > (¹) For those reading along, much of this happened in the devel-spanish > mailing list AFAICR. > > You lack knowledge about a lot of things a Developer should know about. > I don't know if you used to know about them back when you did NM, and > you forgot, or what happened there. I would like to tell you: «If you > feel your lack of knowledge is preventing you from exercising your DD > duties with responsibility and sucess, perhaps you should consider > unofficially redoing NM.» But I'm not going to say that, because it's > obvious you wouldn't deem it necessary. So I'm going to say to you: «You > really need to clue up, and a good way would be grabbing the NM templates, > read upon the subjects covered, and have your answers reviewed by some > AM.» > > If you fail to clue up, I'll find it very hard to reply constructively > to your (admittedly not very frequent) mails on this list, so I'll just > pass and let some other person deal with them. That surely works. > > In case you're wondering what the hell I'm talking about: > > * either you are not subscribed to debian-devel-announce, or you are > not reading messages sent to it, or you are reading them but > ignoring the part where I asked people not to waste my time, or you > outsmarted me for I became enlightened that this may not be a waste > of my time after all. > > * you seem to believe that the Release Team can put packages in > testing even if their dependencies will not be satisfied, because > the package will work regardless of what dpkg may think of the > matter. Believing that is bad, very very bad. > > With kind regards, > > --- > >> Hello all, good night, > >> I am writting to you because I have seen here: >> http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=klog > >> That I could contact you if needed. > >> Well, I think it is needed. > >> KLog depends on hamlib but its dependency is not for the unstable >> release >> of hamlib. The testing hamlib is enough for KLog. > >> The new versions of KLog fixes bugs and I really thing that KLog should >> be >> moved to testing. > >> Is anything that can be done to add KLog to testing? > >> Thank you very much. > > > > -- > Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es > Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org > > Man is certainly stark mad; he cannot make a flea, yet he makes gods by > the > dozens. > -- Michel de Montaigne > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
