W. Martin Borgert wrote:
On 2009-02-16 15:44, Raphael Geissert wrote:
The idea was to leave them out of *testing*, not immediately dropping them
from the archive.
+1
I'm struggling a little with this. Obviously I'm the first person to
want to see cruft removed and I realize we are just talking about
testing but I'm thinking about something like Gtk1.2 which is currently
orphaned with 60+ r(b)depends. Do we really want to those have issues
too before we have a plan to do anything about them?
Cripes I have been fighting for months for gnome-libs and imlib which
have a handful of r(b)depends between the two. Or libnet0 which has 3.
Thanks,
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
