Riku Voipio <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 08:13:01PM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: >> You may have a more reliable list. As no special uploads should be >> required to make this transition happen, I hope it will be fairly >> smooth. > > It will be much more smoother if you put back the workaround > for #484053. In my testing this is fixed in gcc-snapshot, > and instead of -O0, -Os is sufficient to work around the issue.
Dropping this was an oversight that happened because I forgot to merge 3.8 changes after I prepared 4.0 into the 4.0 packages. I'll add it back and upload again this morning. Thanks. --Jay -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
