Hi, Adeodato Simó wrote: > + Rafael Laboissiere (Sun, 10 May 2009 14:57:15 +0200): > > > The upstream authors of SuiteSparse have released version 3.3.0. If we > > package this version for Debian, we will have to go through another > > library transition since the package will be named libsuitesparse-3.3.0. > > > I gave a try at this new version and proposed [1] to split the libraries > > shipped in this package into individual packages, as has been done for > > COLAMD in the past (package name libcolamd-3.2.0). > > I'm sorry it took so long to get back to you. What you propose sounds > sane to me if you're willing to do the effort. With libcolamd split out > already, hence openoffice.org not being part of a suitesparse transition > more than when strictly necessary, it is less of a pressing issue (since > the rest of suitesparse's reverse dependencies have a less complex > dependency graph), but you're very welcome to do so.
Well, for this time this will not help since libcolamd-3.2.0 AFAIS will become libcolamd2.7 and thus OOo will be inmidst this. But for the future you are right :) Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [email protected] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
