Hi, On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 04:29:13PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >What is your plan and thought? Please let us know. > > My plan is to keep the package alive. I dislike its successor by same > author, ldm, due to its coding style - e.g. hardcoding ssh client > options inside a tiny C program. > > I am right now preparing a new packaging release fixing all bugs against > the package, including removing the watch file, acknowledging that > upstream project is dead.
Good luck. I do not like seeing broken testing package hanging for long tome just to keep package name for you to upload a whole new program after long delay, though. So I am looking for new one to e uploaded soonish. Thanks in advance. > >(I did not see you have followed up any open bug reports on this > >package. Your last upload of this package is in 2006. This is some > >package which claims to help security and this does not look nice > >situation and attracted my attention.) > > Please note that none of the bugreports are security-related. If maintainer is active, I would like the maintainer to reply even with short message so everyone else knows what maintainer is doing. Silence as a maintainer cause worry. This is true especially when package is broken in its main functionality due to missing dependency. Regards, Osamu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
