>Ah, that's the reason. I thought there were different source packages >involved (for libkrb53), but apparently you ask to do a gross hack to >keep the libkrb53 binary package in while migrating krb5 and its >remaining binary packages. This is possible, though I'd rather not do that.
>If we would do something like that we would probably retain all the >binary packages from the previous source package btw. Your call obviously. In a general policy discussion (not this thread, not this mailing list probably) I'd love to try and convince the release team that this is not a hack and is a good thing to do when: * Breakage is null or low * Things are in such a state that if you really had to drop enough packages to make a release, you could. However I'd like to learn more from your side before trying to do that. If we find ourselves sharing a drink at debconf, perhaps we could discuss. --Sam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
