On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Andreas Barth<[email protected]> wrote: >> Or are you simply asking the hppa porters to be more active in filing >> FTBFS bugs against packages after build failures? > > If they would do that, that might be quite helpful to distinguish > between "hppa issue" and "package issue".
I didn't know vlc, xmms2, and xmp were not building. I'll add them to my list and look over the failures. I don't know how to get visibility into what's failing for hppa. I believed the role of the porter was to cater to the package maintainers when something failed on the porters architecture. For example I recently resolved the guile-gnome-platform build issue that was brought to debian-hppa. The petsc build issue is in my queue. The top of my list is the glibc nptl transition. I strongly suggest any other package build problems should be brought to debian-hppa. Cheers, Carlos. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
