* Roger Leigh ([email protected]) [090830 19:13]: > On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 11:59:35AM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > I'm open to suggestions. Perhaps the best way forward is to > > re-introduce an -mt variant name as a symlink to the non-mt name. If > > that's agreeable, I'll get it done today. > > I can't speak for the release team, but if that could be done for > 1.59 and then dropped for 1.60, it would at least keep existing > packages building during a transition period. If the other boost > package maintainers could be notified of this, it then gives us a > month or so of breathing space to fix everything up. I guess then > moving to 1.60 should then be relatively pain-free.
I need to admit I'm not deep into technical knowledge here, so I'll probably agree to anything that allows us to not have an hard break, but a smoother transition. The above sounds fine to me but I do not understand it to an appropriate level to say if it's really good or not. In other words: Steve, Roger, if you think it's a good thing, then please do it. Cheers, Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
