Hi Adam, On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Adam C Powell IV <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 20:16 -0430, Muammar El Khatib wrote: > >> I have uploaded a revision of scalapack in mentors.d.n: >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scalapack/ >> >> If I understood #549707 correctly scalapack-pvm-test depends on >> scalapack1-pvm, but libscalapack-pvm1 is shipped instead and that's >> the problem. So, what I did was to update the debian/shlibs.local >> file to make scalapack-pvm-test depends on the correct binary. Please, >> correct me if I am wrong with this. > > Muammar, there is still a problem with shlibs.local, which is that it > refers to non-existent packages libscalapack-mpich1 and
You are right. I forgot to update it for making the package depends on the new binary name. > libscalapack-lam1 . I think you switched the shlib package name from > libscalapack-mpi1 to libscalapack-openmpi1 to avoid a lintian warning. > But the problem is that on architectures where OpenMPI is not available, > the shlib soname is libscalapack-lam.so.1 which seems even more > inappropriate for a package called libscalapack-openmpi1 . That's why I > created the package names libscalapack-mpi1 and libscalapack-mpi-dev . > Now I understand you. I hadn't seen this: https://buildd.debian.org/[email protected] I will keep the name you created because the changes that I made don't have sense knowing this. > If in spite of this you would like to keep the package name as > libscalapack-openmpi1 I will respect your wishes as the maintainer. But > shlibs.local needs to be modified so all of the shlib package names are > the same (libscalapack-openmpi1) before the package can be uploaded. No, it is OK for me. Thanks for noticing this. Regards, -- Muammar El Khatib. Linux user: 403107. GPG Key = 127029F1 http://muammar.me | http://proyectociencia.org ,''`. : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
