Le vendredi 13 novembre 2009 à 13:28 +0000, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : > Hi, > > I noticed that you've uploaded your package in the meantime. Looking at > the diff, I noticed that there are 31 patches mentioned in the > changelog, rather than the 20 you mentioned. If the patch filenames are
10 were in the previous version in stable already. modulus refresh. > correct, then only two of them actually qualify as "critical" as > mentioned in the changelog (with one of the remainder being "medium"). > > Do you consider that all of the bugs in question are important enough to > be fixed in stable with no likelihood of breaking existing > installations? The comments attached to one of the patches, for > example, indicate that the bug it fixes is "wrong (but apparently > harmless)". I do believe these patches will not break existing installations. Upstream has been maintaining a branch with only fixes, that is now well tested on many non-debian systems. Almost of the bugs that are fixed here put production in danger. You do raise the case of two fixes that could probably be dropped. I would like to try to keep all upstream patches tagged bug, critical or medium for simplicity, as this looks reasonnable with this upstream. Cheers, -- Arnaud Cornet -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
