On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 01:15:57AM +0100, Torsten Werner wrote: > Adam D. Barratt schrieb: > > ftp-team: Please decruft libquantlib-0.9.9. > > # Broken Depends: > quantlib-swig: quantlib-python [amd64 hurd-i386] > quantlib-ruby [amd64] > rquantlib: r-cran-rquantlib
I believe this to be false: quantlib-swig (0.9.9-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release * debian/control: Updated Standards-Version: to current value -- Dirk Eddelbuettel <[email protected]> Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:01:53 -0600 These things get released together upstream, so Quantlib (QL for short) 0.9.7 had QL-Swig-0.9.7. Now we have QL-0.9.9 and once QL-0.9.9 was actually in unstable (after the dual delay for slower NEW due to dak, and the updates I needed for debian/copyright) I built QL-Swig-0.9.9. Is it possible that this is a side effect of the 'manual push required' that Adam found? > BinNMUs should be scheduled. Maybe not. See https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=quantlib-swig which looks good apart from amd64 which died / got killed. This build is a resource hog due to lots of c++ in one big file, maybe a build for quantlib-swig 0.9.9 on amd64 could be requested on a box with decent memory? Dirk -- Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
