On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:04:23PM +0000, Tim Small wrote: > and it seems that only part of the fix has been applied - the change to > /etc/init.d/wd_keepalive is not present WRT the patch in #554793
Right, and yes, I simply missed it. However, thinking about it some more I wonder if that part is really important. The only use case is a restart of the wd_keepalive daemon, but I simply cannot see a reason to do that. Please keep in mind that wd_keepalive has only one use case, namely keeping the watchdog device triggered while watchdog itself has not yet started or already ended. So why should I restart it? Anyway, if yoz guys think it's worth it I will do a lenny2 version. Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org ICQ 179140304, AIM/Yahoo/Skype michaelmeskes, Jabber [email protected] VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
