* Bill Allombert ([email protected]) [100214 10:19]: > The second step would be to fix packages that Build-Depend on 'libjpeg62-dev' > to Build-Depend on 'libjpeg-dev' instead, but that might make theirs > build-dependencies unsatisfiable until they have been fixed. Again, please do > not make them Build-Depend on 'libjpeg8-dev', or 'libjpeg-dev|libjpeg62-dev' > or > 'libjpeg-dev|libjpeg8-dev' or other combinaisons.
Sorry, but that's *way* too messy. Why don't you answer the mails we send you before sending something out to d-d-a? This single action will delay the release of Squeeze for a couple of weeks. I'm totally annoyed by the lack of coordination, generating unnecessary work etc. Can we please come to an plan how to fix that mess which doesn't involve the upload of more than 200 source packages and ties them to this transition? How about making (at least for the moment) libjpeg62-dev an transition-only package to libjepg8-dev? That would allow us to at least not block so many packages. (We can always at a later moment change that back - or have lintian warnings that build-depends on libjpeg62-dev should be dropped, or have an libjpeg62real-dev, or whatever - but now we need to get the archive and the testing migration operational again.) In other words, unless you object, I'm planing to make the necessary changes. If you have another way that avoids 200+ uploads at this moment and glueing them all together that's fine, but do that fast. If you object otherwise, I'm going to put that to the tech ctte. Cheers, Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
