On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:41:00AM -0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Mike Hommey wrote: > [...] > >>>>On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:39:17AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > >>>>>nmu gluezilla_2.4.3-1 galeon_2.0.7-1.2 chmsee_1.0.7-1.2 > >>>>>gnome-python-extras_2.25.3-4.1 xiphos_3.1.2-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild > >>>>>with fixed dh_xulrunner, see #567746' dw gluezilla_2.4.3-1 > >>>>>galeon_2.0.7-1.2 chmsee_1.0.7-1.2 gnome-python-extras_2.25.3-4.1 > >>>>>xiphos_3.1.2-1 . ALL . -m 'xulrunner (>= 1.9.1.6-2)' > [...] > >It seems the nmus haven't triggered on the architectures where > >xulrunner-dev >= 1.9.1.6-2 is available. Could you check what is > >happening ? > > Which package / architecture combinations haven't been tried that > you think should have been? > > The archive is still at xulrunner 1.9.1.6-1 for alpha, armel, mips, > powerpc and sparc. So far as I can see, all other architectures have > built all of the binNMUs, with a couple of exceptions for e.g. > gluezilla being not-for-us on mipsel.
Mmmmm I was basing my mail on https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=galeon and likewise for others packages, which only show the logs for the non binNMUs version for the ones that are currently not dep-wait. Turns out the buildd site is wrong, since http://packages.debian.org/sid/galeon lists the binNMU versions. Sorry for the noise. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
