On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:53:20 +0000, Robert Lemmen wrote: > hi folks, > > i was going through bts.turmzimmer.net teh other day, looking for stuff > to do. i wasn't very successfull, but found a couple of packages which i > think should just be removed from testing. this is a list with a short > rational each, i have tagged all but the last one on bts.t.n as well, no > idea why the last one doesn't show up there... > > spfmilter > rc-buggy: #475130 > other bugs > low popcon > no upload in long time > low bug reaction > > blootbot > rc-buggy: #502753 > other bugs > low popcon > no upload in long time > low bug reaction > > libtzinfo-ruby > rc-buggy: #503591 > low popcon > not in stable > > bash-completion-lib > rc-buggy: #555036 > not in stable, we have bash-completion > > pdfposter > rc-buggy: #569552 > not in stable > low popcon > version in debian outdated > > anjuta-extras > rc-buggy: #572254 > not in stable > low popcon > > clamav-getfiles > rc-buggy: #502751 > no resolution in sight > maintainer agrees > low popcon > > now: is that a stupid idea to do? is it useless? if not, how to go about > it? i would have sent a message to each rc bug in question, then waited > a week and then asked someone to do the actual removals. is that the > correct process? who do i have to ask to do the removals?
you can send removal request bugs to [email protected] against package 'release.debian.org'. mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
