Philipp Kern wrote: > I suppose lxde-common without lxpanel doesn't make much sense? Apart from > that you could also denote the dependency with "[!kfreebsd-i386 > !kfreebsd-amd64]" until it's ported. This is a kludge, agreed, but a > simple unblock won't do. (It's either force-hinting the package in > despite the broken dep of tasksel-meta-faux or temporarily editing > the fake package.)
Understood. Right now lxde is broken in squeeze for all archs without lxde-common 0.5. A force-hinting would give the broken dep on kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 only. > Apart from that lxpanel seems non-binNMUable for menu-cache 0.3.2-2, > because the dev package was renamed, see [1]. So that needs a sourceful > upload anyway. Thanks for your kindly explanations. I'd make a sourceful upload with some bug fixes when ries come back. Best regards, -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
