On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 07:43:50PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 05:18:38PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > > You may be right (unfortunately), although I think libparted0d would be > > good enough and would save my poor typing fingers a bit. (There's > > precedent for that in libavcodec et al.) > > I suppose you mean just editing the package name and leaving the SONAME > as-is?
Yes. I don't want to diverge from the upstream SONAME. > (That's a bit off the usual 0d suffix, though.) Oh, is it? If there's a more appropriate convention, I'd certainly prefer it. -- Colin Watson [[email protected]] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
