Your message dated Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:10:13 +0100
with message-id
<[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#578356: Please binNMU oprofile_0.9.6-1 on all
architectures against newer libbfd (binutils)
has caused the Debian Bug report #578356,
regarding Please binNMU oprofile_0.9.6-1 on all architectures against newer
libbfd (binutils)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
578356: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=578356
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
X-Debbugs-CC: [email protected]
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu
oprofile is dynamically linked against binutils' libbfd, which doesn't
have a stable ABI and bumps soname quite often. From
/usr/lib/oprofile/libopagent.so.1.0.0:
Dynamic Section:
NEEDED libbfd-2.20.so => not found
NEEDED libdl.so.2
NEEDED libc.so.6
SONAME libopagent.so.1
libbfd-2.20.so is now replaced by libbfd-2.20.1-system.20100303.so.
This renders linking against libopagent impossible. More info can be
found on #558412.
Thanks,
Arthur.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, April 19, 2010 09:49, Arthur Loiret wrote:
> oprofile is dynamically linked against binutils' libbfd, which doesn't
> have a stable ABI and bumps soname quite often. From
> /usr/lib/oprofile/libopagent.so.1.0.0:
>
> Dynamic Section:
> NEEDED libbfd-2.20.so => not found
[...]
> libbfd-2.20.so is now replaced by libbfd-2.20.1-system.20100303.so.
Scheduled.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
