Your message dated Sat, 15 May 2010 21:54:57 +0100
with message-id
<1273956897.11837.1613.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#581782: nmu: arpack_2.1+parpack96.dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #581782,
regarding nmu: arpack_2.1+parpack96.dfsg-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
581782: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=581782
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu
Hi,
it seems arpack was built in an unclean chroot and now forces the
installation of libatlas3gf-base on amd64; in contrast on i386:
libblas3gf | libblas.so.3gf | libatlas3gf-base
nmu arpack_2.1+parpack96.dfsg-3 . amd64 . -m "Rebuild in a clean chroot, to
pick the correct blas dependency"
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, 2010-05-15 at 22:17 +0200, Thomas Weber wrote:
> it seems arpack was built in an unclean chroot and now forces the
> installation of libatlas3gf-base on amd64; in contrast on i386:
> libblas3gf | libblas.so.3gf | libatlas3gf-base
>
> nmu arpack_2.1+parpack96.dfsg-3 . amd64 . -m "Rebuild in a clean chroot, to
> pick the correct blas dependency"
Scheduled.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
