Hi, On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 03:22:36PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > Would it be possible to upload a minimal version only carrying the security > patch to testing-security?
Possible, yes. I'd like to avoid that, though if possible. It would need a rebuild, whereas I can upload -11 as-is already (and it fixes some other important stuff, too, as you see in the changelog. No XML signing support *only* on kfreebsd-i386 is, umm, bad. Same as dependency differences because of the bashisms...) > Otherwise I'd propose to upload your -11 version to t-p-u. OK. Let's wait for the release team for their opinion. > Btw the testing-security team has an embargoed queue as well, so next time it > should also work to upload a fixed version prior to disclosure if the > migration is a common show stopper for this package. If I knew in advance that gcc-defaults would block again - yes, I could have done that. But well, I noticed that stopper only 1 day before the disclosure, see the reporting date/trime of #584545. And it normally would not have been a blocker if someone didn't decide they need to bump libgc-bcs .shlibs again... Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [email protected] | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
