"Andreas Barth" <[email protected]> wrote:
>* Scott Kitterman ([email protected]) [100626 23:51]: >> There is a bit of difference over how to specify which versions to build >> for, >> but if we don't need to expose it externally (and I don't see a case for >> this), then it's an internal matter for package build systems as long as >> they >> support a requirement that arch: any packages be binNMUable for new Python >> versions. > >There are pre-ideas that we might be able to binNMU arch=all-packages >as well - nothing that will come too early, but it might be useful to >not depend on the fact that we only binNMU arch=any. > No. We don't plan to depend on this. Arch all binNMU would be quite welcome and would help us solve some other issues around making Python transitions easier and more robust. Scott K -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
