On Tue, June 15, 2010 11:39, Mark Purcell wrote: > On Monday 07 June 2010 22:24:17 Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> > A targetted fix for that bug with no ABI change is impossible? >> >> If the primary reason for proposing the transition now is to pull in the >> fix for that bug, then a targetted fix would be much appreciated if >> possible (it's one less transition on the to-do list, for one thing). [...] > I have had a detailed attempt at the Nikon fix without an ABI change, but > it would appear to not be possible without an ABI change and rebuild of > all packages. > > Thus my request for the libexiv2-9 transition remains.
Please go ahead. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
