On 07/15/2010 11:57 PM, dann frazier wrote: > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:52:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: >> On 07/15/2010 10:04 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 21:04 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: >>>> We have run into a problem with libmikmod on stable-security in the most >>>> recent DSA. That was released with the version number 3.1.11-a-6+lenny1, >>>> following the usual scheme. However, as it seems hppa had a version that >>>> used >>>> the old binNMU numbering scheme: 3.1.11-a-6.0.1, which is considered newer: >>>> http://packages.debian.org/lenny/libmikmod2 >>> >>> [also visible on http://release.debian.org/proposed-updates/stable.html >>> fwiw] >>> >>>> Is there a way that we can solve this for hppa, or is the only way out a >>>> new >>>> DSA update for all 12 archs with only change a new version number? >>> >>> I've been trying to think of an answer that doesn't necessitate a >>> complete rebuild, but haven't come up with one thus far. >>> >>> Any solution that involves a sourceful upload will need to be rebuilt on >>> all architectures. I'm not sure if the security archive / buildd setup >>> makes it possible to only attempt to build a package on a restricted set >>> of architectures; even if it does, as soon as the package is accepted in >>> to proposed-updates the remaining architectures will then be auto-built >>> for stable. >> >> I guess that only a manual build of a binNMU old scheme on hppa will >> save you from having a sourceful upload and rebuilds on all >> architectures. Probably the hppa buildd admins (in Cc) can help here? > > I can certainly do a build/upload if someone points me to the binNMU > old scheme process :)
AFAIK, it's a matter of updating the changelog with an entry with the appropriate version (3.1.11-a-6+lenny1.0.1) and building the binary package. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
