(keeping you CC'ed in case you're not subscribed to -release, which often happens...please tell me, of course, if that's unneeded)
Quoting Carsten Hey ([email protected]): > * Christian PERRIER [2010-08-07 09:15 -0400]: > > Maybe you might want to reconsider the situation when reading Phil > > Kern's answer in this thread? > > I don't want to work on the old code and his answer in this thread was > "I'll close the case for the freeze exception for deborphan ...". This > doesn't sound like there would be something to reconsider. Hmm, that was not my understanding. My interpretation is that Phil mentioned he would remove the freeze exception for deborphan *because* you sent your intent to orphan the package. I personnally think that a reasonable compromise would be to grant you a freeze exception for a "reasonable" delay allowing you to work on the new code and propose these changes here. I have good expectations this would be accepted by the RM.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
